GeForce2 MX/MX 400 vs GeForce RTX 2060

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is positioned at rank #750 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX/MX 400

#740

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

361900%

#742

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

328067%

#743

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

327200%

#747

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

297533%

#748

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

295500%

#750

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#751

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#752

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

100%

#753

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

100%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

67%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

33%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

33%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 352750% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.

Insight	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce RTX 2060
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-352750%)	✅Leading raw performance (+352750%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 44006.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.

Insight	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce RTX 2060
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+44006.3%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($15)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX/MX 400 and GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 scores 4 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 352750%. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1680 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score	4	14,114+352750%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	1920+114%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	6.451 TFLOPS+100%
Boost Clock	1575 MHz	1680 MHz+7%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	64	120+88%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	6 GB+1100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce RTX 2060
DirectX	7.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)+71%
OpenGL	1.2	4.6+283%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce RTX 2060
Encoder	None	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	MPEG-2 Decoder	NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs	MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 72.

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce RTX 2060
TDP	25W-84%	160W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	229mm
Height	100mm	113mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	55°C-24%	72
Perf/Watt	0.2	88.2+44000%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 costs 87.5% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 39100% better value. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce2 MX/MX 400	GeForce RTX 2060
MSRP	$129-63%	$349
Avg Price (30d)	$15-88%	$120
Performance per Dollar	0.3	117.6+39100%
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	TU106
Release	August 1 2020	January 7 2019
Ranking	#523	#168