GeForce2 MX vs GeForce GTX 1060

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce2 MX is positioned at rank #754 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX

#744

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

542850%

#746

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

492100%

#747

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

490800%

#751

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

446300%

#752

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

443250%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

100%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

50%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce2 MX is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The GeForce2 MX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 335366.7% higher G3D Mark score and 9423.8% more VRAM (6 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX.

Insight	GeForce2 MX	GeForce GTX 1060
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-335366.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+335366.7%)
Longevity	Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+9423.8%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $60 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 273864.4% better value per dollar than the GeForce2 MX.

Insight	GeForce2 MX	GeForce GTX 1060
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+273864.4%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($49)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce2 MX Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX and GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce2 MX

The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 335366.7%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score	3	10,064+335367%
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2048	2560+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS	8.873 TFLOPS+88%
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	1733 MHz+50%
ROPs	40	64+60%
TMUs	64	160+150%
L1 Cache	2 MB+113%	0.94 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce2 MX	GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce2 MX comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 9423.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	6 GB+9424%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX	7.0	12+71%
OpenGL	1.2	4.5+275%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

Feature	GeForce2 MX	GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder	None	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	MPEG-2 Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs	MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 151.2% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce2 MX	GeForce GTX 1060
TDP	25W-86%	180W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin
Length	160mm	173mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.1	55.9+55800%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce2 MX launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce2 MX costs 18.3% less ($11 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce2 MX) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 167600% better value. The GeForce2 MX is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).