GeForce2 MX vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce2 MX
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce2 MX is positioned at rank #754 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1052500% higher G3D Mark score and 18947.6% more VRAM (12 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1052500%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1052500%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 87319.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce2 MX.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+87319.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce2 MX
The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 1052500%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce2 MX) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 64 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 31,578+1052500% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 7680+275% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+747% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2610 MHz+126% |
| ROPs | 40 | 80+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 7.5 MB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 60+275% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 240+275% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce2 MX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 18947.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce2 MX) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 12 GB+18948% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12 Ultimate+71% |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 4.6+283% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 167.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 285mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-91% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-14% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 110.8+110700% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce2 MX launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce2 MX costs 91.7% less ($541 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce2 MX) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 53400% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-84% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-92% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 53.5+53400% |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #407 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce2 MX and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
