GeForce2 MX vs Radeon RX 7600
GeForce2 MX
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce2 MX is positioned at rank #754 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 552600% higher G3D Mark score and 12598.4% more VRAM (8 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-552600%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+552600%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 108229.2% better value per dollar than the GeForce2 MX.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+108229.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX and Radeon RX 7600
GeForce2 MX
The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 552600%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce2 MX) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600) with 64 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 16,581+552600% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+360% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2655 MHz+130% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 32+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce2 MX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 12598.4% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 8 GB+12598% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12.2+74% |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 4.6+283% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 147.4% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-85% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-20% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 100.5+100400% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce2 MX launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The GeForce2 MX costs 80.4% less ($201 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce2 MX) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 66200% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-52% | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-80% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 66.3+66200% |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 33 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #407 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce2 MX and Radeon RX 7600
