GeForce2 MX vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce2 MX
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce2 MX is positioned at rank #754 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 417733.3% higher G3D Mark score and 12598.4% more VRAM (8 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-417733.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+417733.3%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 97860.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce2 MX.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97860.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce2 MX
The GeForce2 MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX scores 3 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 417733.3%. The GeForce2 MX is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce2 MX) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce2 MX) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) with 64 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 12,535+417733% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+92% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1777 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 2.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 20+25% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 12598.4% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 8 GB+12598% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). OpenGL: 1.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12 Ultimate+71% |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 4.6+283% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 135.5% difference. The GeForce2 MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-81% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-9% | 66°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 96.4+96300% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce2 MX launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The GeForce2 MX costs 76.6% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (GeForce2 MX) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 59900% better value.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-48% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-77% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 60.0+59900% |
| Codename | GA107 | GA106 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #407 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce2 MX and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
