GeForce3 Ti 200 vs Radeon IGP 340M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs Radeon IGP 340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs Radeon IGP 340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon IGP 340M

2018

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce3 Ti 200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs Radeon IGP 340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon IGP 340M

The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 3 — the GeForce3 Ti 200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the Radeon IGP 340M uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	Radeon IGP 340M
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2944	3584+22%
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.07 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock	1710 MHz+14%	1500 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184	224+22%
L1 Cache	2.9 MB+230%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon IGP 340M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	Radeon IGP 340M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 340M.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	Radeon IGP 340M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 230W — a 6.7% difference. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 340M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.