GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON IGP 345M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON IGP 345M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON IGP 345M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce3 Ti 200

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅RADEON IGP 345M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce3 Ti 200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌514.3% higher power demand at 215W vs 35W.

RADEON IGP 345M

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 215W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce3 Ti 200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm, 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce3 Ti 200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON IGP 345M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce3 Ti 200

The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.

RADEON IGP 345M

The RADEON IGP 345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the RADEON IGP 345M's 3 — the GeForce3 Ti 200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the RADEON IGP 345M uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 768 (RADEON IGP 345M). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 345M).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	RADEON IGP 345M
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2944+283%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.07 TFLOPS+667%	1.313 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	184+283%	48
L1 Cache	2.9 MB+1426%	0.19 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce3 Ti 200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 345M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	RADEON IGP 345M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce3 Ti 200 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 345M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 1 MB (RADEON IGP 345M) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	RADEON IGP 345M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the RADEON IGP 345M's 35W — a 144% difference. The RADEON IGP 345M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 345M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	RADEON IGP 345M
TDP	215W	35W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	183mm	—
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	60	—
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce3 Ti 200 (2018 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce3 Ti 200	RADEON IGP 345M
MSRP	$149	—
Codename	TU104	Baffin
Release	September 20 2018	October 30 2016
Ranking	#94	#577

Search GeForce3 Ti 200 on Amazon

Search RADEON IGP 345M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.