GeForce3 Ti 200 vs RADEON IGP 345M
GeForce3 Ti 200
Popular choices:
RADEON IGP 345M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is positioned at rank 382 and the RADEON IGP 345M is on rank 414, so the GeForce3 Ti 200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce3 Ti 200
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 345M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce3 Ti 200 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce3 Ti 200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON IGP 345M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON IGP 345M.
| Insight | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce3 Ti 200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce3 Ti 200 and RADEON IGP 345M
GeForce3 Ti 200
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $699.
RADEON IGP 345M
The RADEON IGP 345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce3 Ti 200 scores 4 versus the RADEON IGP 345M's 3 — the GeForce3 Ti 200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce3 Ti 200 is built on Turing while the RADEON IGP 345M uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 768 (RADEON IGP 345M). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 345M).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+283% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+667% | 1.313 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+283% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+1426% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 1 MB (RADEON IGP 345M) — the GeForce3 Ti 200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce3 Ti 200 draws 215W versus the RADEON IGP 345M's 35W — a 144% difference. The RADEON IGP 345M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce3 Ti 200) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 345M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 183mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce3 Ti 200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce3 Ti 200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | TU104 | Baffin |
| Release | September 20 2018 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #94 | #577 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce3 Ti 200 and RADEON IGP 345M
