Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is positioned at rank #264 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 116.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake).
| Insight | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-116.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+116.2%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 44.1% better value per dollar than the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake).
| Insight | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+44.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) scores 5,500 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 116.2%. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is built on Xe LPG while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 11,892+116% |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 2560+63900% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz+11% | 1755 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2.5 MB+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 158.6% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-88% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 235mm |
| Height | 0mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+301% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.0 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 44.2% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $249-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-33% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.0 | 79.3+44% |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GA106 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #496 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
