GRID M10-0Q vs Radeon R7 M270

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-0Q is positioned at rank 389 and the Radeon R7 M270 is on rank 609, so the GRID M10-0Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0Q

#374

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

36932%

#389

GRID M10-0Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

100%

#390

Quadro FX 560

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

95%

#391

GRID V100-2Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000

95%

#392

Quadro FX 5800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40

87%

#393

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

80%

#394

FireStream 9170

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20

80%

#395

Quadro FX 1700

MSRP: $699|Avg: $500

77%

#396

GRID P40-6Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

75%

#397

Quadro FX 540

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

68%

#398

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

60%

#399

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

60%

#400

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

60%

#401

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

57%

#402

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

57%

#403

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

55%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M270

#599

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

4208%

#601

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3815%

#602

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3805%

#606

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

3460%

#607

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3436%

#609

Radeon R7 M270

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#610

GeForce 9800 GTX

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

100%

#611

Mobility Radeon HD 5850

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

99%

#612

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

99%

#614

GeForce 205

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

98%

#615

GeForce 9600 GSO

MSRP: $129|Avg: $25

97%

#616

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

MSRP: $229|Avg: $40

97%

#617

GeForce 9400

MSRP: $59|Avg: $15

97%

#618

GeForce 7350 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $10

96%

#620

Mobility Radeon HD 3850

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

95%

#621

Mobility Radeon HD 4870

MSRP: $299|Avg: $20

93%

#622

GeForce 9800M GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $5

92%

#623

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual

MSRP: $140|Avg: $35

91%

#624

Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M10-0Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M270.

Insight	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 M270
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID M10-0Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M10-0Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $300), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 105.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 M270
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+105.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($150)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID M10-0Q Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 M270 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-0Q and Radeon R7 M270

GRID M10-0Q

The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.

Radeon R7 M270

The Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the Radeon R7 M270 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 M270 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 940 MHz.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 M270
G3D Mark Score	796+3%	775
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+132%	0.7219 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1306 MHz+39%	940 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB+233%	96 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 M270
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M270) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 M270
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M270). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 M270
DirectX	12_1	12 (11_1)
Max Displays	0	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 M270's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R7 M270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GRID M10-0Q	Radeon R7 M270
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	3.5	10.3+194%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M10-0Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R7 M270 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The GRID M10-0Q costs 50% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 2.6 (Radeon R7 M270) — the GRID M10-0Q offers 103.8% better value. The GRID M10-0Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).