
GRID M10-2B vs FirePro W600

GRID M10-2B
Popular choices:

FirePro W600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-2B is positioned at rank 372 and the FirePro W600 is on rank 253, so the FirePro W600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2B
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-2B.
| Insight | GRID M10-2B | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $80), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 174.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-2B | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+174.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2B and FirePro W600

GRID M10-2B
The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-2B scores 1,644 and the FirePro W600 reaches 1,695 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the FirePro W600 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2B) vs 512 (FirePro W600). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600).
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,644 | 1,695+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+528% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-2B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W600 has 2 GB. The FirePro W600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro W600) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-2B draws 225W versus the FirePro W600's 75W — a 100% difference. The FirePro W600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2B) vs 350W (FirePro W600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | Unknown |
| Perf/Watt | 7.3 | 22.6+210% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-2B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the FirePro W600 launched at $599 and now averages $30. The FirePro W600 costs 62.5% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.6 (GRID M10-2B) vs 56.5 (FirePro W600) — the FirePro W600 offers 174.3% better value. The GRID M10-2B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | FirePro W600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $599-76% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $30-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.6 | 56.5+174% |
| Codename | GM204 | Cape Verde |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #433 | #732 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















