GRID M60-2Q vs Tesla K8

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-2Q vs Tesla K8 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M60-2Q vs Tesla K8: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
200% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Tesla K8

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 194.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M60-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (5,203 vs 5,111), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M60-2Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla K8 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,000 cheaper on MSRP at $1,000 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 194.7% (5.1 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla K8 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M60-2Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M60-2Q vs Tesla K8 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

Tesla K8

The Tesla K8 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 16 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 693 MHz to 811 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,111 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-2Q scores 5,203 and the Tesla K8 reaches 5,111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K8 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 1,536 (Tesla K8). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q) vs 2.491 TFLOPS (Tesla K8). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 811 MHz.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Tesla K8
G3D Mark Score	5,203+2%	5,111
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+33%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+94%	2.491 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+45%	811 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128	128
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Tesla K8
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID M60-2Q and 128-bit on the Tesla K8. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) vs 0.5 MB (Tesla K8) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Tesla K8
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-2Q draws 225W versus the Tesla K8's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Tesla K8 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-2Q) vs 350W (Tesla K8). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Tesla K8
TDP	225W	100W-56%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	23.1	51.1+121%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-2Q came in at $3000, while the Tesla K8 launched at $1000. On MSRP, Tesla K8 was 66.7% cheaper ($2000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 5.1 (Tesla K8) — the Tesla K8 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-2Q (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Tesla K8
MSRP	$3000	$1000-67%
Performance per Dollar	1.7	5.1+200%
Codename	GM204	GK104
Release	August 30 2015	September 16 2014
Ranking	#433	#515

Search GRID M60-2Q on Amazon

Search Tesla K8 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.