
GRID P4-2Q vs GeForce GTX 470

GRID P4-2Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 470
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P4-2Q is positioned at rank #285 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-2Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 60% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 470.
| Insight | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+60%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P4-2Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID P4-2Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $235 (vs $349), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 49.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+49.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($235) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($349) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-2Q and GeForce GTX 470

GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.

GeForce GTX 470
The GeForce GTX 470 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,145 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-2Q scores 3,162 and the GeForce GTX 470 reaches 3,145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 470 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 470). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470).
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,162 | 3,145 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+357% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+343% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 128+129% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P4-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 470 has 1 GB. The GRID P4-2Q offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 470) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+60% | 1.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 470's 215W — a 4.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-2Q) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 470). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 215W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 93 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1 | 14.6+4% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-2Q launched at $1500 MSRP and currently averages $235, while the GeForce GTX 470 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The GRID P4-2Q costs 32.7% less ($114 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.5 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 9.0 (GeForce GTX 470) — the GRID P4-2Q offers 50% better value. The GRID P4-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | $349-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $235-33% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5+50% | 9.0 |
| Codename | GM204 | GF100 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #433 | #572 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















