
GRID P4-2Q vs GeForce 770M

GRID P4-2Q
Popular choices:

GeForce 770M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P4-2Q is positioned at rank 285 and the GeForce 770M is on rank 57, so the GeForce 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-2Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 770M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P4-2Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 770M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $235), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 503.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+503.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($235) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-2Q and GeForce 770M

GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.

GeForce 770M
The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-2Q scores 3,162 and the GeForce 770M reaches 3,246 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce 770M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 960 (GeForce 770M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce 770M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 797 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,162 | 3,246+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+113% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+215% | 1.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+48% | 797 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+860% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P4-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 770M has 512 MB. The GRID P4-2Q offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce 770M) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce 770M's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-2Q) vs 350W (GeForce 770M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1 | 43.3+207% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 770M costs 83% less ($195 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.5 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 81.2 (GeForce 770M) — the GeForce 770M offers 501.5% better value. The GRID P4-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $235 | $40-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5 | 81.2+501% |
| Codename | GM204 | GK106 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #433 | #603 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















