CPU
GPU
GRID P4-2Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 860M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P4-2Q is positioned at rank 285 and the GeForce GTX 860M is on rank 177, so the GeForce GTX 860M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-2Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 860M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 860M.
| Insight | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 860M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 860M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $235), it costs 79% less, resulting in a 360% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+360%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($235) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-2Q and GeForce GTX 860M
GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.
GeForce GTX 860M
The GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1152 or 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,095 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-2Q scores 3,162 and the GeForce GTX 860M reaches 3,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 860M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 860M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 860M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,162+2% | 3,095 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+78% | 1152 or 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+247% | 1.389 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+9% | 1085 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+140% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 860M's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-2Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 860M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 14.1 | 41.3+193% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 860M costs 78.7% less ($185 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.5 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 61.9 (GeForce GTX 860M) — the GeForce GTX 860M offers 358.5% better value. The GRID P4-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID P4-2Q | GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $235 | $50-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5 | 61.9+359% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #433 | #578 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P4-2Q and GeForce GTX 860M
