
GRID P6-4Q vs FirePro W7000 Adapter

GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:

FirePro W7000 Adapter
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P6-4Q is positioned at rank 280 and the FirePro W7000 Adapter is on rank 219, so the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-4Q
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000 Adapter
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P6-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7000 Adapter holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 889.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+889.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P6-4Q and FirePro W7000 Adapter

GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

FirePro W7000 Adapter
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the FirePro W7000 Adapter reaches 4,383 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the FirePro W7000 Adapter uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,429+1% | 4,383 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS | 2.432 TFLOPS+10% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+80% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P6-4Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W7000 Adapter has 4 GB. The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000 Adapter) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the FirePro W7000 Adapter's 150W — a 40% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-33% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.3+52% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899 and now averages $15. The FirePro W7000 Adapter costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.5 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 292.2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 890.5% better value. The GRID P6-4Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $899-55% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $15-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.5 | 292.2+891% |
| Codename | GM204 | Pitcairn |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #535 | #477 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














