CPU
GPU
GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P6-4Q is positioned at rank 280 and the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is on rank 13, so the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-4Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P6-4Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P6-4Q.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Blackwell (2024−2025) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the GRID P6-4Q, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 202.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+202.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P6-4Q and GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) reaches 4,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,429 | 4,463 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3584+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P6-4Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.3 | 89.3+102% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.5 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 89.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 202.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $50-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.5 | 89.3+203% |
| Codename | GM204 | GN22-X2 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #535 | #não classificado |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P6-4Q and GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
