CPU
GPU
HD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
GeForce 840M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The HD Graphics 630 is positioned at rank 350 and the GeForce 840M is on rank 352, so the HD Graphics 630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 630
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 840M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The HD Graphics 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 840M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the HD Graphics 630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 630 and GeForce 840M
HD Graphics 630
The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.
GeForce 840M
The GeForce 840M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the GeForce 840M reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce 840M uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 384 (GeForce 840M). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 840M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,111+1% | 1,100 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 0.8632 TFLOPS+125% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1124 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 3 | 8+167% |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 840M has 2 GB. The GeForce 840M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the GeForce 840M's 33W — a 75% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (GeForce 840M). Power connectors: Integrated vs Legacy.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-55% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 74.1+123% | 33.3 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 630 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM108 |
| Release | January 1 2017 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #823 | #854 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics 630 and GeForce 840M
