HD Graphics 630
VS
GeForce 940M

HD Graphics 630 vs GeForce 940M

HD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 940M

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The HD Graphics 630 is positioned at rank #350 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 630

#339
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
977%
#341
886%
#342
884%
#346
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
803%
#347
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
798%
#349
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
100%
#350
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#353
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
98%
#356
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#358
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#359
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
96%
#360
96%
#361
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
95%
#362
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 940M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 630.

InsightHD Graphics 630GeForce 940M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Leading raw performance (+2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 940M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 630 and GeForce 940M

Intel

HD Graphics 630

The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 940M

The GeForce 940M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,133 points.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the GeForce 940M reaches 1,133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce 940M uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 384 (GeForce 940M). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 940M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1176 MHz.

FeatureHD Graphics 630GeForce 940M
G3D Mark Score
1,111
1,133+2%
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Maxwell
Process Node
14 nm++
28 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.384 TFLOPS
0.9032 TFLOPS+135%
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1176 MHz+18%
ROPs
3
8+167%
TMUs
24
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 630GeForce 940M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 940M has 2 GB. The GeForce 940M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureHD Graphics 630GeForce 940M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the GeForce 940M's 33W — a 75% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (GeForce 940M). Power connectors: Integrated vs Legacy.

FeatureHD Graphics 630GeForce 940M
TDP
15W-55%
33W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
74.1+116%
34.3
💰

Value Analysis

The HD Graphics 630 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureHD Graphics 630GeForce 940M
MSRP
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$30
Codename
Kaby Lake GT2
GM108
Release
January 1 2017
March 13 2015
Ranking
#823
#847