Intel Arc Pro A60
Radeon RX 590
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 590 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 590 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 590: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 175W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 590 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌36.2% HIGHER MSRP$380 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 33.4 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Radeon RX 590
2018Why buy it
- ✅38.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 33.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌34.6% higher power demand at 175W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon RX 590 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Radeon RX 590
The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 and the Radeon RX 590 reaches 9,315 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 590 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 590). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,493+2% | 9,315 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+18% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+33% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 590 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Intel Arc Pro A60 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 590 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 590 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Arc Pro A60 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 590. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 590) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 590). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 590's 175W — a 29.5% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 500W (Radeon RX 590). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-26% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.0+37% | 53.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Arc Pro A60 came in at $380, while the Radeon RX 590 launched at $279. On MSRP, Radeon RX 590 was 26.6% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 33.4 (Radeon RX 590) — the Radeon RX 590 offers 33.6% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A60 (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380 | $279-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0 | 33.4+34% |
| Codename | DG2-256 | Polaris 30 |
| Release | June 6 2023 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #275 | #285 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro A60 and Radeon RX 590
