
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
2018Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016β2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Plus Graphics 655: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 655
2018Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016β2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than Iris Plus Graphics 655: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Iris Plus Graphics 655 better than Radeon HD 7750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 7750 make more sense than Iris Plus Graphics 655?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 7750

Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics 655
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 scores 1,729 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,729+2% | 1,703 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+31% | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 72 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7750).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W β a 114.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 60Β°C.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-73% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 60Β°C-29% |
| Perf/Watt | 115.3+272% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 costs 100+% less ($109 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 15.6 (Radeon HD 7750) β the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $109 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 15.6 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT3e | Cape Verde |
| Release | April 3 2018 | February 15 2012 |
| Ranking | #723 | #731 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













