Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 7750

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7750

2012Boost: 800 MHz

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Iris Plus Graphics 655

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
  • βœ…More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016βˆ’2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7750

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • βœ…Less risky long-term buy than Iris Plus Graphics 655: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Plus Graphics 655 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • ❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Iris Plus Graphics 655 better than Radeon HD 7750?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,729 vs 1,703 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (15W vs 55W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of Unknown and better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Iris Plus Graphics 655 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 7750 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon HD 7750 make more sense than Iris Plus Graphics 655?
Yes. Radeon HD 7750 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $109 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Iris Plus Graphics 655. The trade-off is that Iris Plus Graphics 655 currently gives you 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 7750 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
1080p
low16 FPS19 FPS
medium11 FPS12 FPS
high7 FPS8 FPS
ultra4 FPS4 FPS
1440p
low11 FPS12 FPS
medium6 FPS6 FPS
high3 FPS3 FPS
ultra1 FPS2 FPS
4K
low4 FPS4 FPS
medium2 FPS3 FPS
high1 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
1080p
low75 FPS54 FPS
medium49 FPS28 FPS
high32 FPS20 FPS
ultra23 FPS13 FPS
1440p
low51 FPS17 FPS
medium28 FPS10 FPS
high20 FPS7 FPS
ultra15 FPS5 FPS
4K
low23 FPS5 FPS
medium15 FPS3 FPS
high12 FPS2 FPS
ultra8 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
1080p
low78 FPS77 FPS
medium62 FPS61 FPS
high52 FPS51 FPS
ultra39 FPS38 FPS
1440p
low58 FPS57 FPS
medium47 FPS46 FPS
high39 FPS38 FPS
ultra29 FPS29 FPS
4K
low39 FPS38 FPS
medium31 FPS31 FPS
high26 FPS26 FPS
ultra19 FPS19 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
1080p
low78 FPS77 FPS
medium62 FPS61 FPS
high52 FPS51 FPS
ultra39 FPS38 FPS
1440p
low58 FPS57 FPS
medium47 FPS45 FPS
high39 FPS37 FPS
ultra28 FPS26 FPS
4K
low39 FPS31 FPS
medium29 FPS23 FPS
high22 FPS19 FPS
ultra15 FPS13 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 7750

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 655

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in April 3 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,729 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7750

The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 scores 1,729 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 800 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
G3D Mark Score
1,729+2%
1,703
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm+++
28 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8064 TFLOPS
0.8192 TFLOPS+2%
Boost Clock
1050 MHz+31%
800 MHz
ROPs
6
16+167%
TMUs
48+50%
32
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
72 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (FL 11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7750).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
Encoder
QuickSync
VCE 1.0
Decoder
QuickSync
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W β€” a 114.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 60Β°C.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
TDP
15W-73%
55W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
300W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
β€”
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85
60Β°C-29%
Perf/Watt
115.3+272%
31.0
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 costs 100+% less ($109 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 655) vs 15.6 (Radeon HD 7750) β€” the Iris Plus Graphics 655 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 7750
MSRP
$0-100%
$109
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
15.6
Codename
Coffee Lake GT3e
Cape Verde
Release
April 3 2018
February 15 2012
Ranking
#723
#731