Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is positioned at rank #403 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1633.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1633.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1633.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 147.6% better value per dollar than the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+147.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 scores 1,172 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 1633.1%. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is built on Generation 7.5 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 22 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 20,312+1633% |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 22 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 4864+1420% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+2009% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1665 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 4 | 80+1900% |
| TMUs | 40 | 152+280% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-85% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 101.6+160% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 85.7% less ($240 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 147.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-62% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-86% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3 | 72.5+147% |
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | GA104 |
| Release | May 27 2013 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #835 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
