Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce GTX 1650
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 189.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-189.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+189.8%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and GeForce GTX 1650
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 189.8%. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 10 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,715 | 7,869+190% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Turing |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 80 | 896+1020% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1665 MHz+23% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 91.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 28W-63% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0 | 104.9+8% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 104.9 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | TU117 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #584 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and GeForce GTX 1650
