Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Atom E3825
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Atom E3825
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is positioned at rank 1079 and the Atom E3825 is on rank 626, so the Atom E3825 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Performance Per Dollar Atom E3825
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Atom E3825 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Newark (2003) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Atom E3825 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Atom E3825
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Newark (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom E3825
The Atom E3825 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $73.
Processing Power
The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Atom E3825 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom E3825 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus 1.33 GHz on the Atom E3825 — a 40.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Newark (2003) architecture, while the Atom E3825 uses Bay Trail-I (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Atom E3825's 525 — a 3.9% lead for the Atom E3825.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Atom E3825 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+50% | 1.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | — | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Newark (2003) | Bay Trail-I (2013) |
| PassMark | 505 | 525+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom E3825 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus DDR3L-1066 on the Atom E3825 — the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ supports 197% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom E3825 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) vs 4 (Atom E3825) — the Atom E3825 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) and Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3825).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Atom E3825 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+13233% | DDR3L-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 8 GB+419430300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) / not specified (Atom E3825). The Atom E3825 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Atom E3825 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Atom E3825
