CPU
GPU
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Atom D510
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is positioned at rank 1079 and the Atom D510 is on rank 626, so the Atom D510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Performance Per Dollar Atom D510
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Atom D510 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Newark (2003) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Atom D510 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Atom D510
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Newark (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom D510
The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.
Processing Power
The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Atom D510 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom D510 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus 1.67 GHz on the Atom D510 — a 18% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the Newark (2003) architecture, while the Atom D510 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ scores 505 against the Atom D510's 525 — a 3.9% lead for the Atom D510.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Atom D510 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+20% | 1.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | — | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Newark (2003) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 505 | 525+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 130 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 350 |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom D510 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ versus DDR2-800 on the Atom D510 — the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom D510 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) vs 4 (Atom D510) — the Atom D510 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) and NM10 (Atom D510).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Atom D510 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+19900% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 4 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3200+) vs None (Atom D510). The Atom D510 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom D510 targets Nettop. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ | Atom D510 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel GMA 3150 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | None |
| Target Use | — | Nettop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Atom D510
