Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E3-1268L v5

AMD

Opteron 6282 SE

16 Cores16 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1268L v5

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E3-1268L v5 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E3-1268L v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E3-1268L v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6282 SE

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($1,019 MSRP vs $377 MSRP).
  • 300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.

Xeon E3-1268L v5

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $642 less on MSRP ($377 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
  • Delivers 168.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($377 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6282 SE across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,334 vs 6,385).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6282 SE better than Xeon E3-1268L v5?
Yes. Opteron 6282 SE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6282 SE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.4% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6282 SE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Opteron 6282 SE is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1268L v5 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Opteron 6282 SE comes in 170.3% more expensive on MSRP at $1,019 MSRP versus $377 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1268L v5 is also 168.1% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E3-1268L v5 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E3-1268L v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Opteron 6282 SE

The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.

Intel

Xeon E3-1268L v5

The Xeon E3-1268L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,334 points. Launch price was $377.

Processing Power

The Opteron 6282 SE packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E3-1268L v5 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1268L v5 — a 3% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1268L v5 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Opteron 6282 SE uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1268L v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6282 SE scores 6,385 against the Xeon E3-1268L v5's 6,334 — a 0.8% lead for the Opteron 6282 SE. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureOpteron 6282 SEXeon E3-1268L v5
Cores / Threads
16 / 16+300%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+8%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per module)+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Interlagos (2011−2012)
Skylake-DT (2015)
PassMark
6,385
6,334
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6282 SE uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1268L v5 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 6282 SEXeon E3-1268L v5
Socket
G34
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Opteron 6282 SE was priced at $1019, while the Xeon E3-1268L v5 came in at $377. On launch pricing ($1019 vs $377), Xeon E3-1268L v5 was $642 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Opteron 6282 SE delivers 6.3 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1268L v5 — making the Xeon E3-1268L v5 the 91.3% better value option.

FeatureOpteron 6282 SEXeon E3-1268L v5
MSRP
$1019
$377-63%
Performance per Dollar
6.3
16.8+167%
Release Date
2011
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.