Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2420 v2

AMD

Opteron 6282 SE

16 Cores16 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2420 v2

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2420 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2420 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2420 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6282 SE

2011

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
    • Launch MSRP is still $1,019 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2420 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 75% higher power demand at 140W vs 80W.

    Xeon E5-2420 v2

    2013

    Why buy it

    • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
    • Draws 80W instead of 140W, a 60W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (6,349 vs 6,385).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Opteron 6282 SE better than Xeon E5-2420 v2?
    Yes. Opteron 6282 SE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6282 SE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6282 SE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Opteron 6282 SE is the better buy right now. Opteron 6282 SE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,019 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon E5-2420 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Opteron 6282 SE vs Xeon E5-2420 v2 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Opteron 6282 SE

    The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.

    Intel

    Xeon E5-2420 v2

    The Xeon E5-2420 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,349 points. Launch price was $480.

    Processing Power

    The Opteron 6282 SE packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2420 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE versus 2.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2420 v2 — a 20% clock advantage for the Opteron 6282 SE (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Opteron 6282 SE uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2420 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6282 SE scores 6,385 against the Xeon E5-2420 v2's 6,349 — a 0.6% lead for the Opteron 6282 SE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6282 SE vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2420 v2.

    FeatureOpteron 6282 SEXeon E5-2420 v2
    Cores / Threads
    16 / 16+167%
    6 / 12
    Boost Clock
    3.3 GHz+22%
    2.7 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.6 GHz+18%
    2.2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    8 MB (total)
    15 MB (total)+88%
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per module)+700%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    32 nm
    22 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Interlagos (2011−2012)
    Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
    PassMark
    6,385
    6,349
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Opteron 6282 SE uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2420 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureOpteron 6282 SEXeon E5-2420 v2
    Socket
    G34
    LGA1356
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 3.0+50%