P106-100 vs GeForce RTX 3070
P106-100
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The P106-100 is positioned at rank #43 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P106-100
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P106-100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 234.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P106-100.
| Insight | P106-100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-234.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+234.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The P106-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $200 for the GeForce RTX 3070, it costs 85% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 99.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | P106-100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+99.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P106-100 and GeForce RTX 3070
P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the P106-100 scores 6,628 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 234.5%. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | P106-100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,628 | 22,172+235% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 5888+207% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.655 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+205% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 120 | 184+53% |
| L1 Cache | 0.7 MB | 5.8 MB+729% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P106-100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P106-100 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P106-100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | P106-100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen.
| Feature | P106-100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-100 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | P106-100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-66% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.4 | 100.8+14% |
Value Analysis
The P106-100 launched at $224 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The P106-100 costs 85% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 220.9 (P106-100) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the P106-100 offers 99.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | P106-100 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224-55% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-85% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 220.9+99% | 110.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA104 |
| Release | December 12 2017 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #529 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P106-100 and GeForce RTX 3070
