Quadro 2000 D vs Quadro FX 5800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000 D vs Quadro FX 5800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000 D vs Quadro FX 5800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000 D

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 497.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 62W instead of 189W, a 127W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 5800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 5800

2008

Why buy it

✅46.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
484.1% HIGHER MSRP
$3,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌204.8% higher power demand at 189W vs 62W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 5800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 2000 D instead at 1,239 vs 1,211, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 2000 D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 2000 D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,900 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 497.6% (2.1 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 5800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro 2000 D vs Quadro FX 5800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro FX 5800

The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the Quadro FX 5800 reaches 1,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the Quadro FX 5800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5800). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5800).

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Quadro FX 5800
G3D Mark Score	1,239+2%	1,211
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	192	240+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS+30%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Quadro FX 5800
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 D and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5800.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Quadro FX 5800
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the Quadro FX 5800's 189W — a 101.2% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Quadro FX 5800
TDP	62W-67%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	178mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	20.0+213%	6.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000 D came in at $599, while the Quadro FX 5800 launched at $3499. On MSRP, Quadro 2000 D was 82.9% cheaper ($2900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 0.3 (Quadro FX 5800) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 600% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 2000 D (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro 2000 D	Quadro FX 5800
MSRP	$599-83%	$3499
Performance per Dollar	2.1+600%	0.3
Codename	GF106	GT200B
Release	October 5 2011	November 11 2008
Ranking	#892	#815

Search Quadro 2000 D on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 5800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.