Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

2011Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000 D

2011

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 499% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 12.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 24% higher power demand at 62W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

2013

Why buy it

  • 80.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $499 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 490.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.2 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 62W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 80.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 2000 D instead at 1,239 vs 1,222, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 2000 D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual makes the most sense to buy today. It is $499 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 490.8% (12.2 vs 2.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2000 D has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual reaches 1,222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual).

FeatureQuadro 2000 DRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
G3D Mark Score
1,239+1%
1,222
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
768+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 2000 DRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000 D has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual carries 512 MB. Quadro 2000 D gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 D and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual.

FeatureQuadro 2000 DRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual's 50W — a 21.4% difference. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro 2000 DRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
TDP
62W
50W-19%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
178mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
20.0
24.4+22%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000 D came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual was 83.3% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 12.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) — the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers 481% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureQuadro 2000 DRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP
$599
$100-83%
Performance per Dollar
2.1
12.2+481%
Codename
GF106
Release
October 5 2011
August 1 2013
Ranking
#892
#881

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.