Quadro 2000 D vs Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000 D is positioned at rank 288 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is on rank 278, so the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000 D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 D holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $350), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 918.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+918.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000 D and Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,217 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000 D scores 1,239 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U reaches 1,217 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 D is built on Fermi while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 1,024 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,239+2% | 1,217 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1024+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+316% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U has 512 MB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2000 D) vs 512 KB (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 D draws 62W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U's 100W — a 46.9% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000 D) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W-38% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 178mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.0+64% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U launched at $350 and now averages $350. The Quadro 2000 D costs 90% less ($315 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) vs 3.5 (Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 911.4% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 D | Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $350-42% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-90% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.4+911% | 3.5 |
| Codename | GF106 | Trinidad |
| Release | October 5 2011 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #892 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000 D and Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
