Quadro 4000 vs FirePro W4100
Quadro 4000
Popular choices:
FirePro W4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 4000 is positioned at rank 339 and the FirePro W4100 is on rank 160, so the FirePro W4100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W4100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 4000.
| Insight | Quadro 4000 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 4000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $183), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 501.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 4000 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+501.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($183) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000 and FirePro W4100
Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.
FirePro W4100
The FirePro W4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 630 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,496 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the FirePro W4100 reaches 1,496 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the FirePro W4100 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 512 (FirePro W4100). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 0.6451 TFLOPS (FirePro W4100).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475 | 1,496+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 512+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4864 TFLOPS | 0.6451 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 4000) vs 256 KB (FirePro W4100) — the Quadro 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the FirePro W4100's 50W — a 95.8% difference. The FirePro W4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 350W (FirePro W4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 142W | 50W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 171mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.4 | 29.9+188% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 4000 launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro W4100 launched at $183 and now averages $183. The Quadro 4000 costs 83.6% less ($153 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.2 (Quadro 4000) vs 8.2 (FirePro W4100) — the Quadro 4000 offers 500% better value. The FirePro W4100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | FirePro W4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $183-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-84% | $183 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.2+500% | 8.2 |
| Codename | GF100 | Cape Verde |
| Release | November 2 2010 | August 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #770 | #766 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 4000 and FirePro W4100
