Quadro 4000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro 4000
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 4000 is positioned at rank #339 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Iris Plus Graphics 645 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 645.
| Insight | Quadro 4000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Iris Plus Graphics 645
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,450 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the Iris Plus Graphics 645 reaches 1,450 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 645). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 645).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475+2% | 1,450 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4864 TFLOPS | 0.8064 TFLOPS+66% |
| ROPs | 32+433% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 645 has 0 MB. The Quadro 4000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 645's 15W — a 161.8% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 645). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 142W | 15W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 10.4 | 96.7+830% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 4000 launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Iris Plus Graphics 645 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.2 (Quadro 4000) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 645) — the Iris Plus Graphics 645 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Release | November 2 2010 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #770 | #720 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 4000 and Iris Plus Graphics 645
