
Quadro 4000 vs GeForce GTX 660M

Quadro 4000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 660M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 4000 is positioned at rank 339 and the GeForce GTX 660M is on rank 190, so the GeForce GTX 660M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 660M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 660M.
| Insight | Quadro 4000 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000 and GeForce GTX 660M

Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

GeForce GTX 660M
The GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 835 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the GeForce GTX 660M reaches 1,452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 660M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 660M). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660M).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475+2% | 1,452 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 384+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4864 TFLOPS | 0.7296 TFLOPS+50% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+1500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 4000) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 660M) — the Quadro 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the GeForce GTX 660M's 50W — a 95.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 142W | 50W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.4 | 29.0+179% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 660M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | GF100 | GK107 |
| Release | November 2 2010 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #770 | #774 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












