Quadro 4000 vs GeForce MX110
Quadro 4000
Popular choices:
GeForce MX110
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 4000 is positioned at rank 339 and the GeForce MX110 is on rank 315, so the GeForce MX110 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX110
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX110 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The GeForce MX110 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX110.
| Insight | Quadro 4000 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 4000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 39% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 4000 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+39%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000 and GeForce MX110
Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.
GeForce MX110
The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the GeForce MX110 reaches 1,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the GeForce MX110 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 256 (GeForce MX110). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475+4% | 1,415 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4864 TFLOPS | 0.5151 TFLOPS+6% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+100% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX110 has 512 MB. The Quadro 4000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 4000) vs 1 MB (GeForce MX110) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the GeForce MX110's 30W — a 130.2% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 350W (GeForce MX110). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 142W | 30W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 10.4 | 47.2+354% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 4000 launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce MX110 launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Quadro 4000 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.2 (Quadro 4000) vs 35.4 (GeForce MX110) — the Quadro 4000 offers 39% better value. The GeForce MX110 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $100-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-25% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.2+39% | 35.4 |
| Codename | GF100 | GM108S |
| Release | November 2 2010 | November 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #770 | #781 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 4000 and GeForce MX110
