Quadro 4000 vs GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro 4000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 4000 is positioned at rank #339 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1403.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 4000.
| Insight | Quadro 4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1403.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1403.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 125.5% better value per dollar than the Quadro 4000.
| Insight | Quadro 4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+125.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000 and GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 1403.2%. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475 | 22,172+1403% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 5888+2200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4864 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+4076% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 184+475% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 5.8 MB+1060% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 4000) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 43.1% difference. The Quadro 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 142W-35% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.4 | 100.8+869% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 4000 launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The Quadro 4000 costs 85% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.2 (Quadro 4000) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 125.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $499-58% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-85% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.2 | 110.9+125% |
| Codename | GF100 | GA104 |
| Release | November 2 2010 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #770 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 4000 and GeForce RTX 3070
