
Quadro FX 3800
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 445M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3800 is positioned at rank 347 and the GeForce GT 445M is on rank 59, so the GeForce GT 445M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 445M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 3800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 445M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3800 | GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 3800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3800 and GeForce GT 445M

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce GT 445M
The GeForce GT 445M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 811 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the GeForce GT 445M reaches 811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GT 445M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 384 (GeForce GT 445M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 445M).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824+2% | 811 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+48% | 0.4216 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 445M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 445M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1.5 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 445M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 12 (11_0)+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800) vs CUDA (GeForce GT 445M). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo VP4.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | CUDA |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the GeForce GT 445M's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The GeForce GT 445M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 350W (GeForce GT 445M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 45W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.4 | 18.0+309% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 445M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800 | GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | GT200B | GK107 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #857 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













