Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1950 GT

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 560

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon X1950 GT

2022Core: 1925 MHzBoost: 2324 MHz

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1950 GT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1950 GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1950 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

  • 50.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 189W instead of 335W, a 146W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 230mm, a 229mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 113.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).

Radeon X1950 GT

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $159 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Delivers 98.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Quadro FX 560 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1950 GT is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 77.2% higher power demand at 335W vs 189W.
  • 22900% longer card at 230mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 560 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7.5% in PassMark G3D (114 vs 106), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1950 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1950 GT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $159 cheaper on MSRP at $140 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 98.6% (0.8 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 560 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1950 GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon X1950 GT

The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 560 scores 114 versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 106 — the Quadro FX 560 leads by 7.5%. The Quadro FX 560 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1950 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 560) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT).

FeatureQuadro FX 560Radeon X1950 GT
G3D Mark Score
114+8%
106
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
240
5120+2033%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
23.8 TFLOPS+3726%
ROPs
32
128+300%
TMUs
80
320+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 560Radeon X1950 GT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 560 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1950 GT carries 512 MB. Radeon X1950 GT gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1950 GT. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Radeon X1950 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 560Radeon X1950 GT
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0c (Quadro FX 560) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1950 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 560Radeon X1950 GT
DirectX
9_0c
9_0c
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 560 draws 189W versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 335W — a 55.7% difference. The Quadro FX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 560) vs 350W (Radeon X1950 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 230mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureQuadro FX 560Radeon X1950 GT
TDP
189W-44%
335W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
230mm
Slots
1
1
Perf/Watt
0.6+100%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 560 came in at $299, while the Radeon X1950 GT launched at $140. On MSRP, Radeon X1950 GT was 53.2% cheaper ($159 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Radeon X1950 GT offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1950 GT (2022 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 560Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP
$299
$140-53%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
0.8+100%
Codename
GT200B
Navi 21
Release
November 11 2008
May 10 2022
Ranking
#815
#25

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.