
Quadro FX 560

Radeon X1950 GT
Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1950 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1950 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1950 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 560
2008Why buy it
- ✅50.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 189W instead of 335W, a 146W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 230mm, a 229mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌113.6% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
Radeon X1950 GT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $159 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Quadro FX 560 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1950 GT is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌77.2% higher power demand at 335W vs 189W.
- ❌22900% longer card at 230mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 560 vs Radeon X1950 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 560
The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon X1950 GT
The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 560 scores 114 versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 106 — the Quadro FX 560 leads by 7.5%. The Quadro FX 560 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1950 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 560) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT).
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 114+8% | 106 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 5120+2033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 23.8 TFLOPS+3726% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 80 | 320+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 560 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1950 GT carries 512 MB. Radeon X1950 GT gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1950 GT. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Radeon X1950 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0c (Quadro FX 560) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1950 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0c | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 560 draws 189W versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 335W — a 55.7% difference. The Quadro FX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 560) vs 350W (Radeon X1950 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 230mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-44% | 335W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 230mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+100% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 560 came in at $299, while the Radeon X1950 GT launched at $140. On MSRP, Radeon X1950 GT was 53.2% cheaper ($159 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) vs 0.8 (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Radeon X1950 GT offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1950 GT (2022 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 560 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $140-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 0.8+100% |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 21 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #815 | #25 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














