Quadro FX 5800
VS
Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

Quadro FX 5800 vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5800

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 5800 is positioned at rank 392 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is on rank 336, so the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5800

#377
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
42209%
#392
Quadro FX 5800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40
100%
#393
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
91%
#394
FireStream 9170
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20
91%
#395
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
89%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
86%
#397
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
77%
#398
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
69%
#399
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
69%
#400
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
69%
#401
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
66%
#402
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
66%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
63%
#404
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
57%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
57%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
51%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

#326
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
888%
#328
805%
#329
803%
#333
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
730%
#334
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
725%
#336
100%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
99%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
93%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
91%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
91%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 5800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro FX 5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $40), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 303.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+303.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 5800 and Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 5800

The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 5800 scores 1,211 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual reaches 1,222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5800) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual).

FeatureQuadro FX 5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
G3D Mark Score
1,211
1,222
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
768+220%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 5800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 5800 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro FX 5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 5800 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
TDP
189W
50W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
6.4
24.4+281%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 5800 launched at $3499 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $100 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.3 (Quadro FX 5800) vs 122.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) — the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers 303.3% better value. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 5800Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP
$3499
$100-97%
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$10-75%
Performance per Dollar
30.3
122.2+303%
Codename
GT200B
Release
November 11 2008
August 1 2013
Ranking
#815
#881