Quadro FX 5800 vs Radeon R9 M270X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 5800 vs Radeon R9 M270X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 5800 vs Radeon R9 M270X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 5800

2008

Why buy it

✅39.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1299.6% HIGHER MSRP
$3,499 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M270X

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,249 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1291.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 5800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 5800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 39.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (1,211 vs 1,204), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 5800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M270X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,249 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1291.5% (4.8 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M270X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 5800 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 5800 vs Radeon R9 M270X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 5800

The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R9 M270X

The Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,204 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 5800 scores 1,211 and the Radeon R9 M270X reaches 1,204 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 5800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M270X uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5800) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M270X). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5800) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M270X).

Feature	Quadro FX 5800	Radeon R9 M270X
G3D Mark Score	1,211	1,204
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	640+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.992 TFLOPS+59%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 5800	Radeon R9 M270X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 5800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M270X.

Feature	Quadro FX 5800	Radeon R9 M270X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 5800 draws 189W versus the Radeon R9 M270X's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Radeon R9 M270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5800) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M270X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro FX 5800	Radeon R9 M270X
TDP	189W	75W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	6.4	16.1+152%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 5800 came in at $3499, while the Radeon R9 M270X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M270X was 92.9% cheaper ($3249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (Quadro FX 5800) vs 4.8 (Radeon R9 M270X) — the Radeon R9 M270X offers 1500% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M270X (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 5800	Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP	$3499	$250-93%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	4.8+1500%
Codename	GT200B	Venus
Release	November 11 2008	March 21 2014
Ranking	#815	#819

Search Quadro FX 5800 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M270X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.