Quadro FX 5800 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Quadro FX 5800
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 5800 is positioned at rank #392 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 5800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 5800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU).
| Insight | Quadro FX 5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 5800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 5800 and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Quadro FX 5800
The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 500 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 5800 scores 1,211 and the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 5800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 55 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 5800) vs 64 (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)).
| Feature | Quadro FX 5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,211 | 1,200 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+275% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 5800 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has 0 MB. The Quadro FX 5800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 5800 draws 189W versus the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)'s 7W — a 185.7% difference. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 5800) vs 1W (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro FX 5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 7W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4 | 171.4+2578% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 5800 launched at $3499 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.3 (Quadro FX 5800) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)) — the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 5800 | UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GT200B | Lakefield GT2 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #815 | #893 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 5800 and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
