Quadro K4000 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Quadro K4000
Popular choices:
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K4000 is positioned at rank 283 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is on rank 16, so the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4000
Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.
| Insight | Quadro K4000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4000 and MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4000 scores 2,719 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000 is built on Kepler while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K4000) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719+3% | 2,637 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS+31% | 0.9523 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 512 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4000 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB. The Quadro K4000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (Quadro K4000) vs 512 KB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) — the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4000 draws 80W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-20% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0+29% | 26.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K4000 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1269 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | GK106 | GF114 |
| Release | March 1 2013 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #613 | #704 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K4000 and MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
