
Quadro K4000M vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

Quadro K4000M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K4000M is positioned at rank 57 and the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is on rank 364, so the Quadro K4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4000M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K4000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K4000M | GeForce GTX 670MX SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4000M and GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

Quadro K4000M
The Quadro K4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 601 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,075 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4000M scores 2,061 and the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI reaches 2,075 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (Quadro K4000M) vs 1,920 (GeForce GTX 670MX SLI).
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | GeForce GTX 670MX SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,061 | 2,075 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 | 1920+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | GeForce GTX 670MX SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4000M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI has 2 GB. The Quadro K4000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | GeForce GTX 670MX SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4000M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro K4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K4000M | GeForce GTX 670MX SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-33% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 88°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.6+49% | 13.8 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















