Quadro K4200 vs Radeon RX 460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon RX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon RX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4200

2014

Why buy it

✅6.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
❌44% higher power demand at 108W vs 75W.
❌41.8% longer card at 241mm vs 170mm.

Radeon RX 460

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 108W, a 33W reduction.
✅Measures 170mm instead of 241mm, a 71mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K4200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5.7% in PassMark G3D (4,332 vs 4,099), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K4200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon RX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4200

The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Radeon RX 460

The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro K4200 scores 4,332 versus the Radeon RX 460's 4,099 — the Quadro K4200 leads by 5.7%. The Quadro K4200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K4200) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon RX 460
G3D Mark Score	4,332+6%	4,099
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1344+50%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.107 TFLOPS	2.15 TFLOPS+2%
Boost Clock	784 MHz	1200 MHz+53%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	112+100%	56
L1 Cache	112 KB	224 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon RX 460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4200 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon RX 460
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Quadro K4200) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon RX 460
DirectX	12_0	12 (FL 12_0)
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K4200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon RX 460
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4200 draws 108W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 36.1% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4200) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon RX 460
TDP	108W	75W-31%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	241mm	170mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Perf/Watt	40.1	54.7+36%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4200 came in at $0, while the Radeon RX 460 launched at $110. On MSRP, Quadro K4200 was 100+% cheaper ($110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro K4200) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 460) — the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 460 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K4200	Radeon RX 460
MSRP	$0-100%	$110
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	37.3
Codename	GK104	Baffin
Release	July 22 2014	August 8 2016
Ranking	#475	#485

Search Quadro K4200 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.