Quadro K4200
VS
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

Quadro K4200 vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

NVIDIA

Quadro K4200

2014Core: 771 MHzBoost: 784 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

2016Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1180 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#93
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
262%
#95
238%
#96
237%
#100
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
216%
#101
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
214%
#103
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
100%
#105
GeForce GTX 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
99%
#106
Radeon HD 7470M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12
99%
#110
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
97%
#114
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
MSRP: $179|Avg: $40
94%
#116
GeForce GTX 880M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
92%
#117
GeForce MX570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $120
92%
#118
Radeon RX 6500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K4200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 460 (móvel).

InsightQuadro K4200Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Performance
Leading raw performance (+5.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-5.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $50), it costs 10% less, resulting in a 5.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro K4200Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+5.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)
More affordable ($45)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4200 and Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

NVIDIA

Quadro K4200

The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.

AMD

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $86.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro K4200 scores 4,332 versus the Radeon RX 460 (móvel)'s 4,100 — the Quadro K4200 leads by 5.7%. The Quadro K4200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K4200) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200) vs 2.115 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 1180 MHz.

FeatureQuadro K4200Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
4,332+6%
4,100
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1344+50%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.107 TFLOPS
2.115 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1180 MHz+51%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+100%
56
L1 Cache
112 KB
224 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K4200Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) has 2 GB. The Quadro K4200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K4200Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Quadro K4200) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro K4200Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
DirectX
12_0
12 (12_0)
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K4200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3.

FeatureQuadro K4200Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Encoder
NVENC 2nd Gen
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4200 draws 108W versus the Radeon RX 460 (móvel)'s 55W — a 65% difference. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4200) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQuadro K4200Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
TDP
108W
55W-49%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
40.1
74.5+86%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K4200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) launched at $99 and now averages $45. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) costs 10% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 86.6 (Quadro K4200) vs 91.1 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers 5.2% better value. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureQuadro K4200Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
MSRP
$0-100%
$99
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$45-10%
Performance per Dollar
86.6
91.1+5%
Codename
GK104
Baffin
Release
July 22 2014
August 8 2016
Ranking
#475
#499