Quadro K620 vs GeForce MX150

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K620 is positioned at rank 99 and the GeForce MX150 is on rank 304, so the Quadro K620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

98%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

97%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

95%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

92%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

90%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

87%

#84

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1002%

#99

Quadro K620

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

100%

#100

Tesla K20Xm

MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A

100%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

94%

#111

Quadro P520

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

92%

#113

Radeon Pro WX 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $65

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX150

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

100%

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

93%

#293

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

723%

#295

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

656%

#296

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

654%

#300

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

595%

#301

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

591%

#304

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

100%

#306

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

99%

#307

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

98%

#308

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

98%

#311

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

95%

#313

GeForce GT 720A

MSRP: $40|Avg: $40

94%

#314

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K620.

Insight	Quadro K620	GeForce MX150
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro K620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $60), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 96.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro K620	GeForce MX150
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+96.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K620 Benchmark Check

GeForce MX150 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K620 and GeForce MX150

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the GeForce MX150 reaches 2,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce MX150 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 384 (GeForce MX150). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX150). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1038 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K620	GeForce MX150
G3D Mark Score	2,213	2,252+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS+8%	0.7972 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1124 MHz+8%	1038 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	192 KB+33%	144 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K620	GeForce MX150
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro K620) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX150) — the Quadro K620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K620	GeForce MX150
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the GeForce MX150's 10W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce MX150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 350W (GeForce MX150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro K620	GeForce MX150
TDP	45W	10W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	49.2	225.2+358%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K620 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce MX150 launched at $150 and now averages $60. The Quadro K620 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 73.8 (Quadro K620) vs 37.5 (GeForce MX150) — the Quadro K620 offers 96.8% better value. The GeForce MX150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).