CPU
GPU
Quadro K620
Popular choices:
GRID M60-1B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K620 is positioned at rank 99 and the GRID M60-1B is on rank 357, so the Quadro K620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K620
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-1B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-1B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K620.
| Insight | Quadro K620 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $120), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 292.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K620 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+292.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K620 and GRID M60-1B
Quadro K620
The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.
GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K620 scores 2,213 and the GRID M60-1B reaches 2,256 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K620 is built on Maxwell while the GRID M60-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K620) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-1B). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,213 | 2,256+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+459% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1178 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 768 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K620 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K620 draws 45W versus the GRID M60-1B's 225W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K620) vs 350W (GRID M60-1B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K620 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-80% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 49.2+392% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K620 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID M60-1B launched at $2500 and now averages $120. The Quadro K620 costs 75% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 73.8 (Quadro K620) vs 18.8 (GRID M60-1B) — the Quadro K620 offers 292.6% better value. The GRID M60-1B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K620 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-94% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-75% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.8+293% | 18.8 |
| Codename | GM107 | GM204 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #660 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K620 and GRID M60-1B
