Quadro P1000
VS
FirePro S10000

Quadro P1000 vs FirePro S10000

NVIDIA

Quadro P1000

2017Core: 1493 MHzBoost: 1519 MHz
VS

FirePro S10000

2012Core: 825 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S10000

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
83%
#321
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11725%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
100%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
99%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
98%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
98%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
93%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
91%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
86%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
85%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
84%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
83%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
82%
#348
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
82%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
78%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro S10000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P1000.

InsightQuadro P1000FirePro S10000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (305mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P1000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P1000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $500), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 519.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro P1000FirePro S10000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+519.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P1000 and FirePro S10000

NVIDIA

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

AMD

FirePro S10000

The FirePro S10000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,537 points. Launch price was $3,599.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 and the FirePro S10000 reaches 4,537 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the FirePro S10000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 4,096 (FirePro S10000). Raw compute: 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000) vs 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 (FirePro S10000). Boost clocks: 1519 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P1000FirePro S10000
G3D Mark Score
4,495
4,537
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
4096 ×2+540%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.555 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS ×2+119%
Boost Clock
1519 MHz+60%
950 MHz
ROPs
16
32 ×2+100%
TMUs
32
112 ×2+250%
L1 Cache
192 KB
448 KB+133%
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P1000FirePro S10000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P1000) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro S10000) — the Quadro P1000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P1000FirePro S10000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000) vs 12 (FirePro S10000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureQuadro P1000FirePro S10000
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S10000). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S10000).

FeatureQuadro P1000FirePro S10000
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
3rd Gen NVDEC
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the FirePro S10000's 375W — a 161.4% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 350W (FirePro S10000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 305mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro P1000FirePro S10000
TDP
40W-89%
375W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
305mm
Height
69mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
112.4+829%
12.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P1000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the FirePro S10000 launched at $3599 and now averages $500. The Quadro P1000 costs 84% less ($420 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.2 (Quadro P1000) vs 9.1 (FirePro S10000) — the Quadro P1000 offers 517.6% better value. The Quadro P1000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureQuadro P1000FirePro S10000
MSRP
$0-100%
$3599
Avg Price (30d)
$80-84%
$500
Performance per Dollar
56.2+518%
9.1
Codename
GP107
Tahiti
Release
February 7 2017
November 12 2012
Ranking
#466
#461