Quadro P1000 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 75.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P1000.

Insight	Quadro P1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-75.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+75.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $80 for the Quadro P1000, it costs 6% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 86.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+86.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P1000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P1000 and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 75.1%. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1519 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P1000	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	4,495	7,869+75%
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	640	896+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.555 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+92%
Boost Clock	1519 MHz	1665 MHz+10%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	192 KB	896 KB+367%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro P1000	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P1000	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Quadro P1000	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Quadro P1000	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	40W-47%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	145mm	229mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	112.4+7%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P1000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 6.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.2 (Quadro P1000) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 86.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).