Quadro P1000 vs Arc Graphics 140T

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro P1000

40

4,495

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Arc Graphics 140T

35

4,500

+0.1%

Iris Plus Graphics 650

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T

#320

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

844%

#322

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

765%

#323

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

763%

#327

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

694%

#328

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

689%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

100%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

99%

#333

GeForce 730A

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

99%

#334

GeForce GT 745A

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

97%

#335

GeForce 710A

MSRP: $35|Avg: $62

96%

#336

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

95%

#338

GeForce MX230

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#340

RADEON HD6410D

MSRP: $35|Avg: $5

94%

#341

GeForce 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

94%

#342

Radeon R7 M465X

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

93%

#344

GeForce 830A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc Graphics 140T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P1000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro P1000	Arc Graphics 140T
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P1000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 274.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P1000	Arc Graphics 140T
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+274.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($80)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P1000 Benchmark Check

Arc Graphics 140T Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P1000 and Arc Graphics 140T

Quadro P1000

The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 and the Arc Graphics 140T reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the Arc Graphics 140T uses Xe+. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140T). Boost clocks: 1519 MHz vs 2350 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P1000	Arc Graphics 140T
G3D Mark Score	4,495	4,500
Architecture	Pascal	Xe+
Shading Units	640+7900%	8
Boost Clock	1519 MHz	2350 MHz+55%
L2 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P1000	Arc Graphics 140T
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	XeSS
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P1000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P1000) vs 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P1000	Arc Graphics 140T
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P1000	Arc Graphics 140T
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T).

Feature	Quadro P1000	Arc Graphics 140T
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 35W — a 13.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140T). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro P1000	Arc Graphics 140T
TDP	40W	35W-13%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	145mm	0mm
Height	69mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	112.4	128.6+14%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P1000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 and now averages $300. The Quadro P1000 costs 73.3% less ($220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.2 (Quadro P1000) vs 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Quadro P1000 offers 274.7% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).