
Quadro P1000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

Quadro P1000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P1000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile).
| Insight | Quadro P1000 | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Blackwell (2024−2025) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $80 for the Quadro P1000, it costs 38% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 58.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P1000 | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+58.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P1000 and GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P1000 scores 4,495 and the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) reaches 4,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P1000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro P1000) vs 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,495 | 4,463 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 3584+460% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P1000 draws 40W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P1000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-20% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 112.4+26% | 89.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) costs 37.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 56.2 (Quadro P1000) vs 89.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 58.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P1000 | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $50-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.2 | 89.3+59% |
| Codename | GP107 | GN22-X2 |
| Release | February 7 2017 | January 2 2025 |
| Ranking | #466 | #não classificado |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















